Seismic behavior of five-story coupled steel plate reinforced concrete composite walls

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.26875

Keywords:

Coupled wall, Composite wall, Steel coupling beam, Seismic behavior, Finite element analysis, Parametric analysis

Abstract

Due to the lack of research background, steel plate reinforced concrete (SPRC) wall piers constructed in the core tubes of super tall buildings in seismic regions have been designed as isolated SPRC walls without considering their interaction (coupling action) provided by the steel link (coupling) beams at floor levels, which may lead to poor material efficiency and underestimated overall performance. Research is urgently needed to examine the seismic performance of multi-pier SPRC walls joined by steel coupling beams at floor levels and provide design suggestions if coupling action is considered. In this research program, a 1/4-scaled two-pier and five-story coupled SPRC wall test model with a coupling ratio of 0.3 was constructed and tested under reversed cyclic lateral loading and constant axial compression. Test results showed stable lateral force versus displacement hysteretic behavior with adequate post-yield deformation ductility, great energy dissipation, and strength retention capacities. The coupling mechanism between SPRC walls and steel coupling beams ensured the expected plasticity and damage distribution pattern. The concrete cracking was insignificant along the entire height of the SPRC wall piers. Steel coupling beams of all floor levels developed considerable inelastic shear deformation and consumed most of the input energy. A numerical simulation of the test model was conducted, and its accuracy was verified against the main experimental results. Parametric analyses were conducted to further investigate the effects of key design parameters on the overall structural response of the coupled SPRC walls. The results indicate that increasing the axial load ratio and steel plate ratio or decreasing the flexure-to-shear ratio of the steel coupling beam can enhance the lateral load carrying capacity. The medium value of 0.15 for axial load ratio, a medium value of 6.6% for steel plate ratio, and a shear-to-flexure ratio of 1.0 for steel coupling beams can result in the best displacement ductility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AISC 361-16. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction; 2016.

ACI 318–19. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary (ACI 318R-19). Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute; 2014.

Abdelatee AE,Kent AH. Design of coupled wall structures as evolving structural systems. Eng Struct. 2014; 73: 100-113.

ASCE 7-16. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Chicago: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2016.

Bengar HA and Aski RM. Performance based evaluation of RC coupled shear wall system with steel coupling beam. Steel Compos Struct. 2016; 20 (2): 337-55

Broberg M, Shafaei S, Kizilarslan E, Seo J, Varma AH, Bruneau M and Klemencic R. Capacity design of coupled composite plate shear wall- concrete-filled system. J Struct Eng. 2022; 148(4): 04022022

Borello DJ, Fahnestock LA. Behavior and mechanisms of steel plate shear walls with coupling. J Constr Steel Res. 2012; 74: 8-16

Cheng MY, Fikri R, Chen CC. Experimental study of reinforced concrete and hybrid coupled shear wall systems. Eng Struct. 2015; 82: 214- 25

Zhang B, Wu YT, Zhaou Q, Bai JL, Yang YB. Energy-balance based plastic design and analysis of hybrid coupled wall system. Structures, 2021, 33: 4096-4111.

Dey S and Bhowmick AK. Seismic performance of composite plate shear walls. Structures. 2016; 6: 59-72

Das R et al. Characterization and optimization of a steel beam to RC wall connection for use in innovative hybrid coupled wall systems. Struct. 2020; 23: 111-25

El-Tawil S, Harries KA, Fortney PJ, Shahrooz BM and Kurama Y. Seismic design of hybrid coupled wall systems: state of the art. J Struct Eng. 2010; 136 (7): 755-69

EN 1993-1-1. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures-Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2005.

FEMA 461. Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components. Washington: Applied Technology Council; 2007.

Gorji MS and Cheng JJ. Plastic analysis and performance-based design of coupled steel plate shear walls. Eng Struct. 2018; 166: 472-84

GB 50011-2010. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development; 2010. (in Chinese)

GB/T 228.1. Metallic materials–tensile testing-Part 1: Method of test at room temperature. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development; 2010. (in Chinese)

GB/T 50081. Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development; 2019. (in Chinese)

JGJ 138-2016. Code for design of composite structures. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development; 2016. (in Chinese)

Kizilarslan E, Bruneau M. Verification of seismic response modification factors of uncoupled composite plate shear walls/concrete filled. J Strut Eng. 2023; 04023060

Kizilarslan E, Broberg M, Shafaei S, Varma AH, Bruneau M. Seismic design coefficients and factors for coupled composite plate shear walls/concrete filled (CC-PSW/CF). Eng Struct. 2021; 244: 112766

Nguyen NH and Whittaker AS. Numerical modeling of steel-plate concrete composite shear walls. Eng Struct. 2017; 150: 1-11

Oh K, Ha H, Jo B and Lee K. An analytical study on structural performance evaluation of coupled steel plate shear wall systems. Int J Steel Struct. 2019; 19(1): 1-13

Park R. Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 1988; Tokyo-Kyoto.

Shafaei S, Varma AH, Seo J, Klemencic R. Cyclic Lateral Loading Behavior of Composite Plate Shear Walls/Concrete Filled. J Strut Eng. 2021; 04021145

Varma AH, Shafaei S, Klemencic R. Steel modules of composite plate shear walls: Behavior, stability, and design. Thin Walled Struct. 2019; 145: 106384.

Wang B, Jiang H and Lu X. Seismic performance of steel plate reinforced concrete shear wall and its application in China Mainland. J Constr Steel Res. 2017; 131: 132-143

Wang W, Ren YZ, Lu Z, et al. Experimental study of the hysteretic behavior of corrugated steel plate shear walls and steel plate reinforced concrete composite shear walls. J Constr Steel Res. 2019; 160: 136-152

Zhang B, Wu YT, Zhou Q, et al. Energy-balance based plastic design and analysis of hybrid coupled wall system. Struct. 2021; 33: 4096-4111

Downloads

Published

2026-03-07

How to Cite

Li, C., Wu, Y. and Huang, H. (2026) “Seismic behavior of five-story coupled steel plate reinforced concrete composite walls”, Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 26(1), pp. 53–62. doi: 10.56748/ejse.26875.

Issue

Section

Articles

Funding data