Open Access Articles Peer Reviewed

Mechanical Properties of Fewer-Girder Steel Plate Composite Bridges during Construction

Authors 5
Published: 2025-03-29 Issue: Vol. 25 , No. 1 Pages: 52-57 Cite this article DOI: 10.56748/ejse.24680

Abstract

With the increasing demands of modern transportation and the advancement of engineering technology, composite steel plate girder bridges have emerged as a significant choice in contemporary bridge construction due to their distinctive structural features and benefits. However, stability issues, particularly deflection, torsion, and buckling, continue to present substantial challenges. This research seeks to elucidate the structural behavior, load distribution, and stress responses of such bridge designs, which are critical for optimizing construction efficiency and ensuring structural safety. To achieve these objectives, a comprehensive series of finite element analyses and experimental tests were conducted, focusing on the stress distribution and local stability of composite steel plate girder bridges under various construction conditions. The study highlights that the 2nd and 4th piers, along with the mid-span of the edge spans, are particularly sensitive areas prone to concentrated stress and potential local buckling. The findings suggest that composite steel plate girder bridges with a reduced number of main girders exhibit distinct mechanical properties compared to traditional designs. Specifically, the decreased number of main girders influences load distribution and stress concentration patterns, which have significant implications for both the construction process and the long-term performance of the bridge.

Keywords

  • Composite Steel Plate Girder Bridge
  • Mechanical Performance
  • Stability
  • Finite Element
  • Bridge Construction
870 474

References

  1. Bajaber, M. A., & Hakeem, I. Y., UHPC evolution, development, and utilization in construction: a review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 10, pp. 1058-1074, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.051
  2. Biscaya, A., Pedro, J. J. O., & Kuhlmann, U., Experimental behavior of longitudinally stiffened steel plate girders under combined bending, shear, and compression. Engineering Structures, vol. 238, pp. 112139, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112139
  3. Chithra, J., Nagarajan, P., & Sajith, A. S., Investigations in twin-cell box girder bridges subjected to combined effects of bending and torsion. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, vol. 7, pp. 120, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00719-2
  4. Csillag, F., & Pavlović, M., Push-out behavior of demountable injected vs. blind-bolted connectors in FRP decks. Composite Structures, vol. 270, pp. 114043, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114043
  5. Ding, J., Zhu, J., Kang, J., & Wang, X., Experimental study on grouped stud shear connectors in precast steel- UHPC composite bridge. Engineering Structures, vol. 242, pp. 112479, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112479
  6. He, J., Suwaed, A. S., & Vasdravellis, G., Horizontal push-out tests and parametric analyses of a locking-bolt demountable shear connector. Structures, vol. 35, pp. 667-683, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.11.041
  7. He, Z. Q., Chen, J., Liu, Z., & Ma, Z.J., An Explicit Approach for Determining the Rational Length of Steel Portion in Steel-Concrete Hybrid Girder Bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 05022011, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5798
  8. Jiang, H., Fang, H., Liu, J., Fang, Z., & Zhang, J., Experimental investigation on shear performance of transverse angle shear connectors. Structures, vol. 33, pp. 2050-2060, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.071
  9. Jung, D. S., Park, S. H., Kim, T. H., Han, J. W., & Kim, C. Y., Demountable bolted shear connector for easy deconstruction and reconstruction of concrete slabs in steel–concrete bridges. Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1508, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031508
  10. Kaplan, O., Guney, Y., & Dogangun, A., A period-height relationship for newly constructed mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey. Engineering Structures, vol. 232, pp. 111807, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111807
  11. Lee, J., Kim, H., Lee, K., & Kang, Y. J., Effect of load combinations on distortional behaviors of simple-span steel box girder bridges. Metals, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1238, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081238
  12. Li, C., Lu, B., Wang, C., & Peng, W., Dynamic Performance Assessment of a Novel Hybrid Bridge System with Spread Steel Box Girders. Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 04021097, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001805
  13. Liang, H., Li, B., Liu, Z., Tan, K., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Deng, K., Staggered-supported steel anchor box system for cable-stay bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 04022054, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001893
  14. Rossi, A., Nicoletti, R. S., de Souza, A. S. C., & Martins, C. H., Numerical assessment of lateral distortional buckling in steel-concrete composite beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 172, pp. 106192, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106192
  15. Siwowski, T., Rajchel, M., &Wlasak, L., Experimental study on the static and dynamic performance of a novel GFRP bridge girder. Composite Structures, vol. 259, pp. 113464, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113464
  16. Soto, A. G., Caldentey, A. P., Peiretti, H. C., & Benítez, J. C., Experimental behavior of steel concrete composite box girders subject to bending, shear, and torsion. Engineering Structures, vol. 206, pp. 110169, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110169
  17. Wei, F., Luo, H.W., Liang, L.N., Xiao, Y.B., Su, C., Mechanical Performance Analysis of Steel-Concrete Joint Section of a Long-Span Hybrid Girder Cable-Stayed Bridge Based on Field Test. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 54-65, 2021.
  18. Xu, C., Zhang, L., Su, Q., & Abbas, S., Mechanical behavior of a novel steel-concrete joint in concrete-composited hybrid continuous bridges. Structures, vol. 36, pp. 291-302, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.030
  19. Zhou, Y., Pei, Y., Zhou, Y., Hwang, H. J., & Yi, W., Field measurements for calibration of simplified models of the stiffening effect of infill masonry walls in high-rise RC framed and shear-wall buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, vol. 19, pp. 87-104, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0549-y